New
China Lobby Feeds on Americans' Need for an Enemy
By Sanford Gottlieb, June 22, 1998
China may be nothing more than a handy enemy for many Americans
-- an attitude that has been exploited by a number of individuals
opposed to any relationship with that country and unaware
of its true course over the last 25 years. While there are
serious areas of disagreement between the two countries, writes
PNS commentator Sanford Gottlieb, there are important reasons
to treat China as anything but an enemy. PNS commentator Sanford
Gottlieb is author of "Defense Addiction: Can America
Kick the Habit?" published by Westview Press, and has
worked for over 30 years for private organizations in the
field of international arms control. PART IV OF IV OF A SPECIAL
CHINA SERIES.
Some Americans are desperately looking for a new enemy to
replace the former Soviet Union.
And their enemy of choice is China, I learned as a "guest"
on several radio call-in shows recently. They would like to
roll back U.S.-China relations to the 1950s, which is to say
no diplomatic relations, no trade, no contacts -- except,
for a time, on the battlefields of Korea.
As President Clinton prepares for his China trip, he faces
a chorus of critical voices -- less extreme than those radio
callers but more influential.
In the House of Representatives, 305 members of congress from
both parties voted to suggest that the president not visit
Tienamen Square until China "pledges such atrocities
will never happen again" and agrees to release political
prisoners. Some Republicans urged him to cancel the trip outright.
Denunciations of the Chinese government come from left and
right. One segment of organized labor has called for protection
against Chinese goods. And columnist Charles Krauthammer sees
China as "a potential rival, a notorious proliferator,
and a potential destabilizer."
All this animosity suggests that "constructive engagement"
is the wrong approach.
But much in China has changed for the better since 1967, when
Richard Nixon wrote of the need for reconciliation. Later,
as president, he initiated the policy Clinton pursues today.
China is now a complex country, trying to juggle authoritarian
Communist Party rule and a growing market economy. It has
loosened the leash on newspaper commentary and is accessible
on the Internet. The government does hold 2,000 political
prisoners, but tolerates calls for expanded local elections
and encourages home ownership in the cities.
The Chinese government "has been shrinking itself,"
in the words of Theresa Gusman, an investment analyst specializing
in Asia.
Gigantic problems still afflict the world's most populous
country. The huge peasant majority continues to live in poverty.
Millions are jobless in the bustling cities.
China's defiance of American values and policies makes headlines,
but cooperative relations between the two have advanced quietly
on several fronts. Major U.S. universities and pharmaceutical
firms have hundreds of research projects in China exploring
cancer, diet and obesity, environmental pollution and energy.
Yale Law School has an exchange program -- even the military
establishments have exchanged visits.
The Chinese government, which did supply nuclear technology
to Pakistan in the past, is now cooperating in efforts to
cool tensions on the Indian subcontinent. It has also helped
curb North Korea's demands for nuclear weapons.
Trade between our two countries now totals $75 billion. Some
175,000 U.S. jobs can be traced to that commerce.
In short, China and the United States have arrived at a fragile
state of interdependence since Nixon's trip.
There are continuing, and serious, problems but common sense
suggests that diplomacy, pressure, and assisting those working
for reform is a wiser approach than reducing contacts. And
this takes time.
Perhaps the Alliance of Christian ministries in China put
it best. "Trade, commerce and cultural exchange are exposing
the Chinese people to the values of faith and freedom."
I don't want new enemies. I doubt most Americans do. I wish
the Chinese people well -- all 1.2 billion of them -- and
hope President Clinton succeeds in keeping the door open.
|