"Ben
Hur" Vs. "Titanic" -- Nature Replaced God in
Film That Speaks to Environmental Age
By Sandy Close, PNS, March 26, 1998
Young people have claimed "Titanic" as their
epic film--much as baby boomers in the 1950s flocked to "Ben
Hur." The two films -- which this year tied for winning
the most ever Oscars awarded to a single film -- reveal how
the world views of two generations have changed over the last
forty years. PNS editor Sandy Close, founder of YO! (Youth
Outlook), a newspaper by and about young people, grew up in
New York movie theaters.
This week "Titanic" tied with "Ben Hur"
in the race for most Oscars ever awarded to a single film.
Anyone old enough to have watched both on the silver screen
must recognize that no two films offer more contrasting views
of the world and of our human possibilities.
Judah Ben-Hur, scion of a noble Jewish family, through a freak
accident winds up a galley slave in the Roman navy. Far from
succumbing, he takes advantage of a collision with an enemy
ship to free himself, rescues the Roman Admiral and navigates
a rickety raft to safety. Hailed as a "son of Rome,"
he returns to his native Jerusalem, wins the affection of
four Arabian horses which allows him to defeat his nemesis
in a chariot race, and ultimately discovers the transformative
power of faith in a loving God.
The heroes of "Titanic," by contrast, are two lovers
doomed by the awesome power of Nature and the hubris of those
who dare to presume they can control it. Jack Dawson drowns
in the icy waters of the Atlantic, but Rose DeWitt Bukater
survives to create a new identity even as she remains a lifelong
captive of her memories.
If there's a message of redemption in the film, it's that
even as an entire civilization sinks beneath the waves, one
can still find self-liberation.
"Ben
Hur," released in 1959, was a towering epic drama for
my generation -- baby boomers reared in the Protestant culture
of the 1950s, convinced we could tame chaos and reshape the
world. Today's young people -- a full generation removed from
my own -- claim "Titanic" as their own. For months
street-wise young people in my office have abandoned their
usual knowing cool to gush over the special effects, the romance,
the historical sweep. Why this film -- whose only plot line
is that the ship hits an iceberg and sinks?
The extraordinary popularity of "Titanic" marks
the coming of age of a generation weaned on environmentalism
as a secular religion. Where a personal God triumphs over
the Roman Empire and ultimately death itself in Ben Hur, impersonal,
overarching Nature is the force that controls humanity's destiny
in "Titanic." Like the iceberg lurking in a serene
and majestic ocean, Nature is not so much malign as indifferent
and unpredictable. It exists -- like evil in a Steven King
novel -- and we must acknowledge it, accommodate it as best
we can, sacrifice ourselves to its will.
Some of "Titanic's" characters -- like Jack, who
balances Rose's life raft while his body slowly freezes in
the sea -- are not without a certain nobility. But the noble
act more often lies in succumbing to the elements rather than
resisting them. Thus the film eulogizes those who "go
down" with a Kevorkian death-with-dignity -- the elderly
couple clasping each other in bed, the millionaire standing
resolute in his tuxedo under the chandelier, the mother tucking
her children into bed with a last goodnight kiss.
For all their frantic dashing of bodies from ship's end to
ship's end, those who survive do so thanks largely to social
standing, shrewdness or sheer luck, if not outright trickery.
(The bravest figure in the film is the upstart Molly Brown
who tries to convince her lifeboat passengers to search for
survivors. She ultimately fails.)
As for friendships and family, Titanic offers little despite
its sentimental dialogue. Parents are self-centered, suffocating
or feeble; friendships are largely irrelevant; romance is
fleeting -- the pursuit of the unattainable -- or perverted
by lust and revenge (as in the case of Rose's fiance).
Ultimately, the film sees the human condition as one of navigating
solo in a universe of random terror. No wonder "Titanic"
rhymes with young people's soul. Yet "Titanic" is
not, in the end, dark -- there is a glimmer of consolation
in the Darwinian world.
Rose offers the role model. In the calamity of man colliding
with nature, Rose finds what she has been searching for from
the beginning of the film -- the energy to liberate herself.
In her final act, she consigns her one remaining tie to the
past into the sea.
Ben Hur talked to me and my peers as if we had it in us to
take on the world. The Titanic's vision is for another, post
environmental culture. It preaches that, in the face of awesome
elements we cannot ultimately control, we must seek and find
detachment.
|