Vietnam
Survives at the Cost of Its Ecology
By Andrew Lam, Pacific News Service, October 30, 1998
If
the Vietnam war was once devastating to that country's populace,
the peace that followed has been nothing short of catastrophic
for its ecology. PNS editor Andrew Lam returned to his homeland
recently to take stock of its natural environment. Lam is a
short story writer and a journalist. A longer version of this
article appeared in the San Jose Mercury News.
HANOI
-- Not long ago General Vo Nguyen Giap -- one of the great
military strategists of the 20th century -- was asked by a
foreign journalist whether, hypothetically, the Vietnamese
could ever wage an effective guerrilla war as they once did
against the French and the Americans.
"No,"
the octogenarian ruefully answered. "I'm afraid that
would be quite impossible."
"Why
not?" the journalist asked.
"We
used to hide in the forests when we fought those wars but
now there's no forest left."
General Giap was only slightly exaggerating, as I discovered
on a recent trip back to my homeland. Vietnam's population
has more than doubled since the war ended 23 years ago --
from 35 million to 78 million. Today one out of three Vietnamese
depend solely on forest and forest products for their living,
and the number is rising steadily, according to the United
Nations Development Program. Whereas the entire Vietnam war
destroyed close to 5 million acres of forest land, some 45
million more have since been destroyed due to population pressures.
One can hardly blame the citizens of this country. Few here
live beyond their means. Indeed, generations of Vietnamese
have survived by turning recycling into an art form. A broken
B-52 bomber's wing serves nicely as a bridge, bomb shells
are turned into foundations for rural homes, broken tanks
and jeep parts are sold as scrap metal, plastic bags and scrap
paper feed the army of street urchins who scavenge on huge
garbage dumps, and on the streets of Hanoi rickety Peugeots,
now 40 years old, run about, thanks to an army of creative
mechanics.
Yet for all that frugality and inventiveness, Vietnam is sliding
toward ecological catastrophe. Less than 23 million acres
of forest are left in the country and some 250,000 to 450,000
are disappearing every year -- much of it for firewood (most
Vietnamese households still use charcoal for domestic cooking
and heating), or for clearing plots for agriculture. Logging
for export has been banned since 1994, but for years the government
turned a blind eye to the sale of raw logs which further ravaged
the forests.
The root of the problem, says a government official in Hanoi,
"is too many hungry mouths to feed. We can't help but
swallow all that was once sacred to us."
Indeed, the latest World Bank figures show that 45 percent
of Vietnamese children are malnourished. And now a devastating
drought is crippling Vietnam's central region and placing
millions more on the brink of starvation. Unemployment has
also been rising in the wake of the spreading Asian economic
flu; the "dong" is losing value while foreign investment
is also drying up. The pressure on Vietnam's natural environment
is intensifying.
Take Mrs. Lau Nguyen and her three children, for instance.
They live in a rural area north of Dalat, a mountainous resort
town where I grew up. They are part of a large population
of landless poor who were resettled here a few years ago at
the expense of the last extensive forests in the country.
Like all their neighbors, the Nguyen rely heavily on the forest
to subsist: their home, except for its tin roof, is made of
wood, as is their furniture. The small patch of corn in their
backyard was clear-cut. They gather twigs and pine cones for
cooking fuel and sell what they don't use. When asked about
governmental restrictions regarding cutting down wood in the
forest, Mrs. Nguyen shrugs: "Can the government arrest
us all? I don't think so. We will starve without the forest."
Dr. Trung Nguyen, director of Hanoi's Institute of Ecological
Economy, notes that the word for environment -- "moi
truong" -- is scarcely known, nor does the idea of an
environmentalist exist. As for governmental awareness, Dr.
Trung's institute received less than $5000 a year in government
support -- "not enough to print pamphlets, let alone
hold seminars or promote public education."
The state finds itself in a tight spot. Although aware that
the threats to the country's ecology are great, it also knows
that the threat of instability is far greater. The word the
Hanoi government most fears these days is "bat on"
-- instability. Environmental protection, many government
officials admit, is the last thing on their minds. Any movement
to suppress deforestation would most likely end up in mass
revolt.
As Vietnam's forests shrink, some of the world's rare species
(including three of the world's ten mammals only recently
discovered) now face extinction -- like the green peacock,
the Java rhino, the barking deer, the Asian elephant, the
kourprey ox.
Yet it wasn't long ago that Vietnamese viewed people as inseparable
from nature. They taught their children to revere the spirits
that protect forests and rivers, and often named their children
after forest animals and plants. Visit any Buddhist temple
in Vietnam and you can still see remnants of this gentle idea
of harmony in the sculptures of animals and plants that grace
the columns.
Almost no one I met in Vietnam seems to share this view anymore,
and certainly none of the young people I met. They are too
hungry or too eager to escape the rural life for the city.
In the center of Hanoi one afternoon, I saw a scrawny young
man fishing at the edge of the lake of Restored Sword, venerated
as the site where a giant turtle rose to the surface to present
a magical sword to King Le Loi with which he defeated invading
Chinese almost 1000 years ago.
Had he seen the turtle lately, I inquired? "No,"
the young man answered, laughing. "I don't think it exists.
But if I do see it, I would catch it to make soup. It would
probably feed my family for at least a month."
|