How
Globalism Became Public Enemy Number One For Both Left And Right
By
Franz Schurmann, fschurmann@pacificnews.org,
April 14, 2000
Until
recently, the left saw capitalism as its ideological enemy while
for the right it was socialism. Today both left and right see
globalism as their main enemy. PNS editor Franz Schurmann argues
that there is more to this coming together than semantics. Schurmann
is a professor emeritus of history and sociology at UC-Berkeley
and author of numerous books on global politics.
First
in Seattle and now in Washington, DC, left and right have come
together to trash globalism. Strange bedfellows or just bedfellows?
An answer can be found by looking at the word globalism. Widely
used -ism words give a sense of how public opinion interprets
the flows of contemporary history. The wide usage of the word
globalism suggests public opinion believes there is a driving
force that is replacing the USA with one world.
Both left and right now see globalism as their main enemy.
Noam Chomsky freely uses the word as does Pat Buchanan. That
means they believe there are powerful forces driving the globalization.
Both agree it is the multinational corporations and agencies
like the IMF that promote multinationalization.
Not so long ago left and right used very different -ism words
to describe their ideological enemies. For the left the main
enemy was capitalism and for the right it was socialism. The
two were irreconcilable opposites. The root word of capitalism,
"capital," meant money to acquire means of production
in order to reap a profit. The suffix -ism made it an ideology
that operated through free markets.
The left called for an eventual abolition of capitalism and
its replacement by socialism. Under socialism strong government
representing the working class would bring equality and equity
into the country's economic life. The right regarded socialism
as an ideology that stunted economic growth. Look at the Soviet
Union, they said. It has a strong socialist government but
can't feed its own people. Bring freedom and free markets
to Russia and soon enough prosperity would arise.
The main ideological code word for the left was class; for
the right it was economic freedom. But now with globalism
their common foe both code words have been left behind. Left
and right agree the multinational corporations that dominate
the New World Order undermine the power both of the working
class and of God-fearing patriotic citizens. Over the last
two decades both left and right have been moving in new ideological
and political directions that have narrowed the gap between
them. By advocating diversity and multiculturalism, the left
has taken over a key concept of the right: identity. Identity
implies identity groups. And identity groups are those marked
by racial, ethnic and religious differences.
The right has always believed in differences. It rejected
the left's contention that regardless of identity differences,
in the end we are all human beings. The only differences that
remain, the left contended, are those of class. Yet now various
right-wing groups have been moving in directions once advocated
by the left.
The religious right, which historically was racist and exclusionary,
has lately been proselytizing among people of every race,
culture and language. For example, people of color from all
over the world have been flocking to the Mormon Church which
not so long ago had racial restrictions. And for years now,
Pat Buchanan has been courting the working class. In Washington
the Teamsters are among his most ardent boosters. At the same
time the left has been moving towards nationalism. Leftists
call for a strong government to not only protect the rights
of workers but also protect the environment, advance human
rights, and broaden entitlements. Many leftist intellectuals
have hoped that one world would break up into three -- Europe,
East Asia and America. So much for the great slogan of the
Communist Manifesto: "Workers of the world unite, you
have nothing to lose but your chains."
Besides agreeing on globalism, both left and right agree on
two other -ism words now popularized in America: racism and
terrorism. Racism began as a left concept. In the 1960s the
worst racists were Southern segregationists. The left played
a leadership role in the Civil Rights movement. But now just
about the entire right -- except for fringe neo-Nazi groups
-- accepts the concept of racial equality. Even Bob Jones
University had to modify its stubborn racism. So as the left
concentrates its oppositional stance on globalist, environmentalist
and human rights issues, the right finishes cleaning out the
last vestiges of racism in its ranks.
Terrorism, practically speaking, refers mainly to neo-Nazi
and Islamic fundamentalist violence. There is little if any
sympathy for either on the right and nothing but loathing
for both on the left. So globalism remains the one driving
issue for both left and right. Buchanan keeps moving towards
endangered American workers and the left moves away from its
third world affiliations. It is not inconceivable that left
and right will, in the coming years, fuse into a single national
front in opposition to the globalist establishment that
runs
the country.
|