After
Oil - Fuel From the Farm?
By
Walter Truett Anderson, Pacific News Service, June 13, 2000
One certainty in this changeable world is that sooner or later
there will be very little or no oil left. Imagine, then, the
implications of an energy system based on fuel derived from
material any farmer can grow. PNS associate editor Walter Truett
Anderson is the author of "The Future of the Self"
(Tarcher Putnam, 1997).
Although
the world's petroleum supplies have turned out to be far greater
than some pessimists believed a few decades ago, sooner or later
oil will inevitably be either hard to get or outrageously expensive
-- or both.
The prospect of hundreds of thousands of new automobiles in
developing countries such as China and India makes this all
the more likely.
As the age of petroleum draws to its close, a whole range
of new fuels and energy technologies are waiting in the wings.
One is ethanol -- good old familiar grain alcohol, but now
produced, with the help of genetically-engineered bacteria,
from a wide range of organic wastes, everything from cornfield
leftovers to wood chips to grass.
A bunch of germs stewing in a vat full of compost material
may not seem a particularly glamorous example of 21st-century
high technology, yet some observers believe it could be one
of the major breakthroughs of our time.
No less a technology-watcher, former CIA director James Woolsey
wrote in a Wall Street Journal article a few years ago, "The
production of ethyl alcohol from biomass may turn out to be
as revolutionary as the production of integrated circuits
from silicon, vastly affecting the world's distribution of
wealth and the fundamentals of international security."
Since then others have come to the same conclusion, and ethanol
technology is currently being pushed strongly by scientists,
agricultural organizations and the federal government.
This enthusiasm is partly based on the fact that there is
a lot of biomass in the world, and a great deal of it is lignocellulose
-- straw, cornstalks, grass, wood -- material that human beings
can't eat. Not a particularly efficient fuel in its natural
state, and until recently could not be converted into alcohol.
The alcohol we use now is mainly produced from edible (and
expensive) grains such as corn. Cornfields of the future might
continue to produce corn for food, while some of the material
called "stover" -- stalks, cobs, husks -- is returned
to the field, and the rest of it is sent to a nearby "biorefinery"
to be processed for fuel.
This has important implications, both global and domestic.
Global strategists such as Woolsey like to consider the political
possibilities. He sees the United States becoming less concerned
about offending the sensibilities of oil-producing states,
the agricultural Ukraine becoming less dependent on oil from
Russia, China feeling less pressure to dominate the oil-rich
South China Sea, subsistence farmers in Africa and Latin America
being paid to grow crops for fuel.
Agricultural economists are more interested in the potential
for improving the lot of American farmers and farm regions.
They see farmers producing new cash crops, perhaps becoming
part owners of cooperative refineries, while rural communities
are reinvigorated by new income and job opportunities. Biomass
refineries will likely produce not only ethanol but probably
a variety of chemicals for industrial use, and feedstocks
for making textiles and plastics.
Unlike some other new alternative fuels and technologies being
discussed and developed, ethanol can be phased in without
enormous changes in cars or driving habits. Most cars are
already able to burn "gasohol" -- a gasoline-alcohol
mix -- containing up to ten percent ethanol, and newer flexible
fuel vehicles can use up to 85 percent ethanol. Even pure
ethanol-burners are a distinct possibility -- millions already
are rolling on the road in Brazil.
From an environmental point of view, ethanol is a mixed blessing.
Ethanol-powered vehicles are extremely clean-burning and put
out less than one percent of the carbon dioxide emitted by
gasoline-powered vehicles. They compare equally well to battery-powered
vehicles which ultimately depend on electricity produced by
burning fossil fuels.
Nevertheless, environmental activists can be expected to take
a hard and skeptical look at anything involving a new application
of biotechnology.
Considering the current momentum, it seems likely that ethanol
will play a significantly larger role in the U.S. economy
in this decade, and a much larger one beyond that -- depending
on the speed of technological progress, governmental support
and public acceptance, and the vagaries of the global oil
market.
The transition will likely be not-too-noticeable for consumers,
a big shift for U.S. agriculture, and potentially an enormous
change for the world in general. We may have ended the Cold
War, but we are still mired in 20th-century petroleum politics.
A competitive alternative to petroleum could, as an article
in Foreign Affairs suggested not long ago, "democratize
the world's fuel market."
|