Table of Contents
| Jinn Home Page
| Search
| Net-Links
Voices
| Heresies
| Vectors
| Pacific Pulse
| The Americas
| California
| Movements
| Civil Conflicts
| YO!

Acknowledge MLK Day, Acknowledge A Movement
By Earl Ofari Hutchinson
Date: 01-08-01
With very few exceptions, major corporations do not give
even the slightest recognition to Martin Luther King, Jr., Day (January
15 this year), proclaimed a national holiday nearly 20 years ago. The
reasons are not hard to find, writes PNS commentator Earl Ofari
Hutchinson, but the occasion should give us a chance to reflect on how
much the civil rights movement accomplished for all of us -- including
the corporations. Hutchinson is the president of The National Alliance
for Positive Action. His e-mail address is ehutchinson@natalliance.org.
His website is. www.natalliance.org.
Corporate executives offer a regular litany of excuses when asked why
they don't give their workers a day off on Martin Luther King, Jr.'s
birthday - or even acknowledge the day with a ceremony.
They claim they must stay open to be competitive, that people need to
shop on that day. Or they insist that no one has ever complained to
them
about not celebrating the day.
Whatever their excuse, 17 years after a deeply reluctant President
Reagan
inked his name on the law making the third Monday in January a national
holiday, corporate America still turns a blind eye to the King holiday.
A study of hundreds of businesses by BNA Inc., a Washington-based
business news publisher last year found that fewer than 25 percent gave
their workers the day off. Worse, this was a sharp drop off from the
year
before.
By contrast, 90 percent of firms gave their employees paid holidays on
Memorial Day. And 50 percent gave a day off on Presidents' Day -- the
least celebrated of our national holidays, except for King's birthday
The rare exceptions to the King black-out are the Metropolitan Life
Insurance Co., the New York and American Stock Exchanges (since 1998),
and a handful of other financial service companies. Some companies such
as Hughes Electronics in California keep their doors open that day but
sponsor events on King and civil rights and encourage employees to
participate in them.
The great irony here is that corporate America has benefited greatly
from
the civil rights movement. By smashing the barriers of legal
segregation
in employment and education, the movement opened corporate doors for
talented and educated minorities and women, made diversity a watchword
at
many firms, and vastly increased the income and earnings of blacks,
minorities, and women.
This fattened profits. Surveys show that blacks spend a greater
proportion of their earnings on corporate goods and service than whites
-- a finding reinforced by the fact that corporate officials spend
billions to advertise and promote their products in minority
communities.
Yet many corporate executives remain oblivious to King day for two
glaring reasons.
First is the misguided, if widely held, belief that King was a black
leader, that the civil rights movement was by and for blacks, and that
his holiday is exclusively a "black holiday." They ignore the
gargantuan
influence of civil rights battles on the women's, gay, and Latino
movements here, and on independence movements in Asia and Africa. They
forget the sweeping changes in law, politics, religion, and education
that made America a more open and democratic society.
The second reason for corporate blindness is deep-seated corporate
racism. In the past two years black employees have filed major lawsuits
against Coca-Cola, American Airlines, Hyundai Semiconductor, Microsoft
and dozens of other companies. The charges are almost always the same.
They say that they are given the worst assignments, lower pay, and
fewer
chances for promotions
Corporate executives vehemently deny practicing discrimination, but the
paltry number of blacks in top-level corporate posts indicates a
pervasive bias. Only a handful of the Fortune 1000 corporations have
CEOs. Nearly ten out of ten senior managers are white males. Fewer than
one in ten of all managerial positions are held by blacks --
and these black managers are paid, on average, less than their white
counterparts
Many blacks also discover that some departments or divisions within a
company are top-heavy with black employees and managers while others
are
virtually lily-white. This leaves many blacks stuck in dead-end
positions, or pigeon-holed into "traditional" posts such as community
relations, equal employment opportunity or human resources departments.
As the discrimination lawsuits show, blacks are often regarded as
pariahs. Many of their corporate peers believe that blacks are lazy,
undisciplined, poorly organized, incompetent, affirmative action hires,
outspoken, rebellious, and chronically prone to blame management or
white
employees for their problems and failures.
If many corporations continue to downplay -- or flat-out deny -- racial
discrimination in their operations, it should come as no surprise that
they snub the civil rights movement, and it's most prominent symbol,
Dr.
King.
Their refusal to pay homage to the man and the movement that did so
much
to spiff up their image and enhance their profit margins shows that
civil
rights still remain hollow words in many corporate boardrooms.

Pacific News Service,
660 Market Street, Room 210, San Francisco, CA 94104,
tel: (415) 438-4755.
Jinn Magazine: <http://www.pacificnews.org/jinn/>
Email:
<pacificnews@pacificnews.org>
Copyright © 1900 Pacific News Service. All Rights Reserved.
Please do not reprint our stories without our permission.
This article is available for reprint.
For rates and information, call (415) 438-4755 or e-mail
<pacificnews@pacificnews.org>
|