Introduction:
All who live in this country and pay their bills, directly or
indirectly, are benefiting from a bull market that most say has lasted 8 or
9 years but which I date back to August 1982 (stock price graphs show the
market changed at this time from a ragged but flat line to an increasingly
steep curve).
To say all is a pretty daring assertion. So before predicting
here's my argument as to why. To survive in this country the vast
majority of people need an address. If you give an address then if it's not
you who pays the bills someone else will.
The immense electronic system that rules over all of us makes
certain that most people have addresses. The police, especially now with
their enhanced search powers, add more to the total (including those who
end up getting prison and jail addresses where the taxpayers pay the
bills). There are not many left who manage to slip through the cracks.
To pay bills you need an income. Rents, mortgage payments and taxes
are high. U.S. economic data shows that the component of national income that
comes from stocks has soared. When an immigrant cook paid sub-standard
wages living with nine others in a crowded room pays his share of the rent
a part of his wages indirectly comes from stock earnings.
I came across an illuminating piece on stocks in the
Chinese-language China Press a few days after the Dow went through the
10,000 point ceiling on March 29. The piece was sent out by the New China
News Agency and was clearly written by a well-informed economist.
The paper was founded almost a century ago in New York city by poor
Chinese laundry and restaurant workers who were fascinated with economics.
Later they threw their support to the Chinese Communists and a lot of them
got into trouble during the McCarthyite period of the 1950's. Now it is a
sturdy paper with lots of reporting, news analysis and ads. The paper's
news people never lost their fascination with economics and in my opinion
do some of the best economic analysis in this country -- unfortunately
inaccessible to the general readership. Consider the following:
In the 1920's only 5% of American households owned stocks. In 1995
40% held stocks.
Over the last ten years the number of stockholders has increased
380%. Home ownership only increased 55%. Last year stocks made up 25% of
family assets. Fifteen years earlier it only was 8%.
Economists cite four reasons for this:
(1) The baby-boomers (born between 1946 and 1964) have invested
their retirement funds in stocks.
(2) People are less fearful of stocks than they were in the past.
According to Stanford Nobel prize winner economist William Sharpe because
so many more people own stocks, the risk is more spread out. And therefore
there is less risk to the individual.
(3) Money supply grows; interest rates and inflation are down. The
result: stocks go up. Economists say that during the last ten years low
interest rates accounted for 80% of investors' returns and corporate
profits for only 20%.
(4) Continued economic growth. Economists say the relationship
between stocks and the entire economy has been getting closer and closer.
Another Stanford economist (judging from the Chinese form of the name it
could be macro economist Thomas Sargent) said:
"At present the wealth generated by the stock market is very closely
connected with [general] economic growth... Some economists say
during the last eight years of continued economic growth firms have
maintained their profits without raising stock prices. Fed Chairman
Alan Greenspan has said that because of huge increase in use
of computers and electronic technology productivity has gone
way up. This is the main reason for the economic growth."
While warning that the "bubble" clearly could burst at some time
the article also says it could go on for another ten years.
The first reason given explains why just about all Americans
benefit from the stock market impelled growth. Any one who has a job will
discover from the first paycheck that taxes, social security and maybe a
special pension fund will be deducted. If President Clinton's proposed
social security reforms go through then all three funds will be deeply
involved with stock markets. If the latter should go kaput then, to use
former President Bush's phrase America will be in "deep doo-doo."
I don't think they will.