There is something strange about the trial (adjourned to June 23)
of Abdullah "Apo" Ocalan (pronounced etch-ahlan) on a small isolated prison
island in Turkey's stunningly beautiful Sea of Marmara.

Ocalan's Island Prison
For weeks there have been rumors of jailers torturing Ocalan --
arguably the world's biggest "terrorist." Yet reporters at his trial have
noted that he has gained weight. And instead of a broken man they see and
hear an eloquent statesman presenting a plan to solve the Kurdish revolt in
Turkey and, by implication, in the region as a whole.
Ocalan -- whose name in Turkish means "taker of revenge" -- in
1984 launched the Kurdish Workers Party (PKK) into an insurgency that still
continues. Daily the Turkish media accuse him of being responsible during
the last 15 years for:
- killing 28,394 Turks
- 3,254 bombings
- 20,915 terrorist actions.
The prosecutors have demanded a death sentence. And many Turks must
be waiting for the first pictures of the hanged Apo. In Turkey those hanged
are draped in a flaring white skirt on which are written their crimes.
Amir Taheri, an emigrant Iranian journalist, writing in the
Arabic-language London-based As-Sharq al-Ausat of June 7, noted the strange
contrast of a dead man walking and talking with the health and confidence
of a great leader. It appears Ocalan is in complete control of his
faculties.
Taheri offered three explanations for the bizarre scene. One is
that the PKK was so long able to wage a fierce war against the Turkish army
because of support from many states which hated Turkey. But now all have
abandoned it. So now Ocalan is just fighting for his life. He even said
what he wants to do in whatever time left him is retire with his wife and
children and tend his garden.
A second explanation is that Ocalan is using "Leninist
dissimulation" in a deadly game of verbal combat. The PKK is a
Marxist-Leninist organization. So, like Lenin, his main concern is not
saving his life but protecting his movement. Taheri casts doubt on the first
reason but sees more credibility in the second.
A third explanation Taheri offered is that Ocalan now sees an
opportunity to move the PKK from violence to peace within the context of
Turkish politics. Kurds would now accept their status as Turkish citizens
of Kurdish descent. Clearly this explanation appeals most to Taheri. He
concluded his piece with the rhetorical question: "even if this way he
saves his skin what harm could it do?"
Ocalan has always insisted that the PKK is a party operating only
in the Turkish context. But the Turkish Kurds are only one portion of the
total number of Kurds in the Middle East. Kurds say there are 25 million of
us. Those hostile to them put the figure much lower. But no one disputes
the fact that the two biggest concentrations are in eastern Turkey and
northern Iraq.
There are good reasons to believe that the PKK is the strongest
political force in northern Iraq. Time after time the Turkish army has
invaded northern Iraq to flush out PKK guerrillas. They never succeeded.
The PKK guerrillas are fish swimming in a friendly Kurdish ocean. When
under external attack they easily melt into the local population. (See the
English-language "Turkish Daily News" of 12 June 1999).
That can't be said of the two other major Kurdish organizations in
northern Iraq: the Kurdish Democratic Party (KDP) and the Patriotic Union
of Kurdistan (PUC). Both were supported by Washington in the wake of the
Gulf War. But when the PUC tilted towards Iran, Washington showed its
displeasure. And then when the KDP tilted towards Saddam Washington again
growled. Yet neither of them has much if any grass-roots support.
Kurds who have been persecuted, betrayed and killed by so many
larger powers are proud of Apo. And if in the end he should be executed his
memory will fuel another hundred years of Kurdish struggle. After all many
Kurds say we've already been fighting for 2,500 years against our
oppressors. What does another century matter?
Now that NATO has occupied Kosovo the White House is moving towards
its long planned Middle Eastern settlement (see Prediction #11). There can
be no region-wide comprehensive settlement without resolving the Iraq
problem. Saddam has a tight grip on most of Iraq but not on Iraqi
Kurdistan. If the KDP and PUC come to terms with Saddam it will be largely
an empty gesture. But if the PKK is brought into talks that could at last
lead to a settlement in Iraq.
Ocalan not only has the power to lead Turkish Kurds into peace with
the Turks but also the Iraqi Kurds into a settlement with the Iraqi Arabs.
Taheri is not the only Middle Eastern observer who sees the great positive
possibilities in the Ocalan trial. The Egyptian Fehmi Howeidi, a well known
moderate Islamist and commentator on Middle Eastern issues, has written at
length on the same possibilities. The generally free but politicized
Turkish media has reported that many members of the Turkish military have
long maintained secret contacts with the PKK (see the same issue of the
Turkish Daily News cited above).
The PKK, in deeds if not in words, operates much like any Maoist
party. One of Maoism's most important guerrilla strategies is "fight-fight
and talk-talk." Another is stick with the poor and make them the ocean in
which the hunted revolutionaries can swim.
The Turkish military holds the ultimate power in Turkey. They are
secularists and nationalists. Their greatest domestic enemy has been a
rapidly rising Islamic tide in the country. Last year they intervened to
oust a duly constituted government led by a moderate Islamist, Necmettin
Erbakan. Why shouldn't the military welcome a chance to work with a
secularist and also nationalist PKK? Officially the PKK has never seen
itself as a transnational entity.
When Ocalan was taken to Turkey a few months ago after his capture
in Nairobi many in the Turkish military might have favored dealing with
Ocalan. But since then Turkey had an election which brought a nasty
surprise. As a result of big electoral gains the ultra-nationalistic "Gray
Wolves" suddenly jumped with new clout onto the Turkish political arena.
Unlike the PKK the National Movement Party (MHP) is an avowed
transnational party. Their popular name is Boz Kurt, "Gray Wolves." Their
aim is some day to create a vast new Turkic empire extending from eastern
Turkistan through Turkic-speaking Central Asia and Turkey and into the
parts of the Balkans which have Turkish and Islamic populations. They
believe in the mystique of a Turkic language common to all their widely
separated peoples. And, in fact, Uighur Turkic as spoken in Chinese
Xinjiang is quite close to the Turkish spoken in the Turkish Cyprus
Republic where the Gray Wolves' late founder Alpaslan Turkesh was born.
The Gray Wolves loudly call for the execution of Ocalan.
Some military fear the Gray Wolves on the fascist right as much as
they do the PKK on the revolutionary communist left. Some others prefer the
left while still others prefer the right. The Turkish military has to be
careful that its ship of state doesn't crash on the shoals of Apo's fate.
A key player determining Ocalan's fate could be the White House.
Turkey is called the "southeastern anchor of NATO." It's also a key player
in Balkan and Middle Eastern destinies. If Clinton feels Ocalan's execution
will hinder his ambitious intentions in those regions it could sway the
Turkish military.
My sense is that Ocalan now stands a better chance being kept alive
than put to death. In Peru erstwhile Shining Path leader Abimael "Gonzalo"
Guzman is alive and also imprisoned on an offshore island. The Shining Path
still has not vanished from the Peruvian political scene.
A possible scenario for Apo is that he may end up having his wife,
kids and garden on that islet prison in the Sea of Marmara.